<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>100TWT.Com - Latest Comments in NYT-on-Twitter: @nytimesbits</title><link>http://100twt.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://100twt.disqus.com/nyt_on_twitter_nytimesbits/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:27:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NYT-on-Twitter: @nytimesbits</title><link>http://discuss.100twt.com/2009/05/18/00571.html#comment-9515143</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This bit is inaccurate on two counts. He was talking about a specific publication, Valleywag. And he wasn't sounding off just about how they write about him, but the effect it was having on Silicon Valley. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:27:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>